Modeling and analysis of a two-stage ORC for recovering waste heat of single flash geothermal cycle

Keywords: Single flash geothermal, Destruction, Organic Rankine Cycle, Waste, Efficiency

Abstract

Reusing heat dissipation in thermodynamic cycles is an exciting proposal to increase efficiency. In this paper, a two-stage ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) is proposed to recover and reuse wasted energy from an SFGC (Single Flash Geothermal Cycle). The working fluids studied for the recovery system include R227ea and R116 and R124 and R125. The effect of the main elements of system performance is investigated using sensitivity analyses. Exergy degradation of various components is also calculated. For working fluids R227ea and R116, the thermal efficiency improved by 7.66%, from 0.2023 to 0.2178. The system's thermal efficiency is improved from 0.2023 to 0.2177 by 7.61% using R124 and R125. The exergy efficiency of the initial working fluid improves by 15.04%, from 0.5044 to 0.5803. Further, the second pair of working fluids from 0.5044 to 0.5852, which indicates a 16.01% system efficiency improvement. 85% of the system exergy is eliminated through the expansion valve, turbine 3, heat exchanger 2, and mixer. Including the recovery phase in the base, SFGC will positively affect the power plant's performance.

Author Biographies

Yashar Aryanfar, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez

Department of Electric Engineering and Computation, Av. Del Charro 450 Norte. Col. Partido Romero. Juárez, Chihuahua, México.

Arash Akhsheej, Islamic Azad University

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch. Tehran 1469669191, Iran

Kasra Ataei Sheykh, University of Tabriz

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tabriz, 5166-15731, Iran

Shaban Mousavi Ghasemlou, Urmia University

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia 57561-15311, Iran

Jorge Luis García Alcaraz, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez

Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, . Av. Del Charro 450 Norte. Col. Partido Romero. Juárez, Chihuahua, México

References

Gallo, G., Puliti, R., Torres, R., & Eleonora Erdmann. (2020). CO2 EOR with in-situ CO2 capture, a Neuquina basin oxycombustion case study. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 10(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.250.

Pérez-Denicia, E., Fernández-Luqueño, F., & Vilariño-Ayala, D. (2021). Suitability assessment for electricity generation through renewable sources: towards sustainable energy production. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 11(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.260.

Cao, Y., & Ehyaei, M. A. (2021). Energy, exergy, exergoenvironmental, and economic assessments of the multigeneration system powered by geothermal energy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127823.

Jalili, M., Ghasempour, R., Ahmadi, M. H., Chitsaz, A., & Ghazanfari Holagh, S. (2021). Exergetic, exergo-economic, and exergo-environmental analyses of a trigeneration system driven by biomass and natural gas. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-10813-3.

Yashar Aryanfar, Mamdouh El Haj Assad, Ali Khosravi, Rahman S M Atiqure, Shubham Sharma, Jorge Luis García Alcaraz, Reza Alayi, Energy, exergy and economic analysis of combined solar ORC-VCC power plant, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Volume 17, 2022, Pages 196–205, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctab099

Ochoa, G. V., Isaza-Roldan, C., & Forero, J. D. (2019). A phenomenological base semi-physical thermodynamic model for the cylinder and exhaust manifold of a natural gas 2-megawatt four-stroke internal combustion engine. Heliyon, 5(10), e02700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02700.

Khanmohammadi, S., Kizilkan, O., & Musharavati, F. (2021). Multiobjective optimization of a geothermal power plant, Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of Geothermal Power Plants (pp. 279-291). Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821037-6.00011-1.

Rathod, D., Xu, B., Filipi, Z., & Hoffman, M. (2019). An experimentally validated, energy focused, optimal control strategy for an Organic Rankine Cycle waste heat recovery system. Applied Energy, 256, 113991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113991.

Bao, J., & Zhao, L. (2013). A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 24, 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.040.

Badr, O., Probert, S. D., & O'callaghan, P. W. (1985). Selecting a working fluid for a Rankine-cycle engine. Applied Energy, 21(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(85)90072-8.

Uusitalo, A., Honkatukia, J., & Turunen-Saaresti, T. (2017). Evaluation of a small-scale waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycle. Applied Energy, 192, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.088.

Lion, S., Michos, C. N., Vlaskos, I., Rouaud, C., & Taccani, R. (2017). A review of waste heat recovery and Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) in on-off highway vehicle Heavy Duty Diesel Engine applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 691-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.082.

Roy, J. P., Mishra, M. K., & Misra, A. (2010). Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle. Energy, 35(12), 5049-5062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.013.

Jang, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Influence of superheat and expansion ratio on performance of organic Rankine cycle-based combined heat and power (CHP) system. Energy conversion and management, 171, 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.053.

Xue, X., Guo, C., Du, X., Yang, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a two-stage organic Rankine cycle for liquefied natural gas cryogenic exergy recovery. Energy, 83, 778-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.088.

Chen, L. P., Cai, L., Zhang, X., Xu, X., & Qiao, J. Y. (2018, December). Hybrid electric vehicle absorption-compression refrigeration system. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 199, No. 3, p. 032072). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/199/3/032072.

Huber, M. L., & Laesecke, A. (2006). Correlation for the Viscosity of Pentafluoroethane (R125) from the Triple Point to 500 K at Pressures up to 60 MPa. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 45(12), 4447-4453. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie051367l.

Assad, M. E. H., Aryanfar, Y., Radman, S., Yousef, B., & Pakatchian, M. (2021). Energy and exergy analyses of single flash geothermal power plant at optimum separator temperature. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(3), 873-881. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctab014

How to Cite
Aryanfar, Y., Akhsheej, A., Ataei Sheykh, K., Mousavi Ghasemlou, S., & García Alcaraz, J. L. (2021). Modeling and analysis of a two-stage ORC for recovering waste heat of single flash geothermal cycle. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 11(2), 51 - 62. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.383

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2021-12-27
Crossref Cited-by logo