Analysis of effluent from caustic treatment plants: Improvement of accuracy in the simultaneous potentiometric determination of sulfide and mercaptide ions

  • Marcio V. Reboucas Braskem S.A., Unidade de Insumos Basicos, Laboratorio, Rua Eteno 1561, Complexo Petroquimico de Camacari, Camacari-Bahia, Brazil, 42810-000
  • Ana Rosa C. G. Massa Braskem S.A., Unidade de Insumos Basicos, Laboratorio, Rua Eteno 1561, Complexo Petroquimico de Camacari, Camacari-Bahia, Brazil, 42810-000
  • Marcos Vinicio Assis Braskem S.A., Unidade de Insumos Basicos, Laboratorio, Rua Eteno 1561, Complexo Petroquimico de Camacari, Camacari-Bahia, Brazil, 42810-000
Keywords: sulfide, thiol, potentiometric titration, interference, sodium hydroxide

Abstract

Potentiometric titration using silver nitrate for determination of sulfide and mercaptide ions, as defined by the UOP Method 209, has been widely used for quality control of Spent Caustic Neutralization Unit in petroleum industries. However, it has been found this procedure does not provide accurate results for samples taken from units based on Wet Air Oxidation (WAO) technology. Therefore, possible sources of error, such as concominant species, between-analytes interference and titration solvent, were investigated and adjustments in the method were proposed. Aqueous media should be used to prepare the titration solution instead of the recommended alcoholic solvent which was found to be related to the quite low analyte recoveries in WAO unit samples. The modified method can be successfully applied to samples with different chemical compositions which is the main advantage over the reference procedure. Limit of detection and relative standard deviation of 0,5 mg.L-1 and 5,2% for sulfide and 0,6 mg.L-1 and 5,5% for mercaptide were achieved.

References

Carlos, T. M. S., & Maugans C. B. (2002). Manage refinery spent caustic efficiently. Hydrocarbon Processing, 81 (2), 89-92.

Horwitz, W. (1982). Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of food and drugs. Anal. Chem., 54: 67A-76A. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00238a765

Karchmer, J.H. (1957). Potentiometric determination of mercaptans in presence of elemental sulfur, Anal. Chem., 29: 425. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60123a028

Karchmer, J.H. (1958). Determining sulfur compounds in petroleum naphtha - The humble scheme. Anal. Chem., 30: 80. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60133a023

Luck, F. (1999). Wet air oxidation: past, present and future. Catalysis Today, 53: 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00112-1

Sheu, S., & Weng, H. (2001). Treatment of olefin plant spent caustic by combination of neutralization and fenton reaction. Wat. Res., 35: 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00466-8

Tamele, M.W., Ryland, L.B., & McCoy, R.N. (1960). Simultaneous determination of hydrogen sulfide and mercaptans by potentiometric titration. Anal. Chem., 32: 1007. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60164a034

UOP Method 209-00. Alkalinity, sulfide and mercaptide analyses of used refinery caustic solutions.

How to Cite
Reboucas, M. V., G. Massa, A. R. C., & Vinicio Assis, M. . (2006). Analysis of effluent from caustic treatment plants: Improvement of accuracy in the simultaneous potentiometric determination of sulfide and mercaptide ions. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 3(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.499

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2006-12-31
Section
Scientific and Technological Research Articles

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code