Well screening for matrix stimulation treatments

  • N. SAAVEDRA Ecopetrol S.A. – Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, A.A. 4185 Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
  • R. SOLANO Ecopetrol S.A. – Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, A.A. 4185 Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
  • Dr. J. GIDLEY Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843-3116, USA
  • C. A. REYES Ecopetrol S.A. – Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, A.A. 4185 Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
  • P. RODRÍGUEZ Ecopetrol S.A. – Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, A.A. 4185 Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
  • F. KONDO Ecopetrol S.A. – Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, A.A. 4185 Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
  • J. HERNÁNDEZ Ecopetrol S.A. – Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, A.A. 4185 Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
Keywords: matrix, acidization, stimulation, damage, well screening

Abstract

Matrix acidizing is a stimulation technique only applicable to wells with surrounding damage. It is therefore very important to differentiate the real formation damage from the damage caused by flow dynamic effects. The mechanical damage corresponds to flow restrictions caused by partial penetration, poor perforation as well as to reduced diameters of the production tubing. The dynamic effects are generated by inertia caused by high flow rates and high-pressure differentials. A common practice in our oil fields is to use a general formulation as acid treatment, most of the times without previous lab studies that guarantee the applicability of the treatment in the formation. Additionally, stimulation is randomly applied even treating undamaged wells with negative results and in the best of the cases, loss of the treatment. The selection of the well for matrix stimulation is an essential factor for the success of the treatment. Selection is done through the evaluation of the skin factor (S) and of the economic benefits of reducing the skin in comparison to the cost of the work. The most appropriate tool for skin evaluation is a good pressure test where the radial flow period can be identified. Nevertheless, we normally find outdated tests most of the times taken with inaccurate tools. The interpretation problem is worsened by completions in which there is simultaneous production from several sand packages and it is difficult to individually differentiate damage factors. This works states a procedure for the selection of wells appropriate for stimulation; it also proposes a method to evaluate the skin factor when there are no accurate interpretations of the pressure tests. A new and increasingly applied methodology to treat wells with high water cuts, which are usually discarded due to the risk of stimulating waterzones, is also mentioned.

References

Brannon, D. H. et al.,1987. "Matrix Acidizing Design and Quality-Control Techniques Prove Successful in Main Pass Area Sandstone", paper SPE 14827, JPT (August).

Economides, M. J., Hill, A.D. and Ehlih-Economides, C., 1994. Petroleum Production Systems, PRT Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Gidley, J. 1985."Acidizing Sandstone Formations: A detailed Examination of Recent Experience", paper SPE 14164, presented in the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nev., (Sep). https://doi.org/10.2118/14164-MS

Gidley, J., Brezovec, E. J. and King, G. 1996."An Improved Method for Acidizing Oil Wells in Sandstone Formations", paper SPE 26580, SPE production and Facilities (February) https://doi.org/10.2118/26580-PA

Hawe, D. 1976. "Direct Approach Through Hall Plot Evaluation Improves the Accuracy of Formation Damage Calculation and Eliminates Pressure Fall-Off Testing", paper SPE 5989 (July).

McLeod, H. O. 1989. "Significant Factors for Successful Matrix Acidizing", paper SPE 20155, presented in the SPE New Mexico Technical Centennial Symposium (Oct.) https://doi.org/10.2118/20155-MS

Meehan, D. N. 1995. "Technology Vital for Horizontal Well Success", Oil & Gas J. (Dec. 11): 39 - 46.

Paccaloni, G., 1992. "A New, Effective Matrix Stimulation Diversion Technique", Artículo SPE 24781 presented in the 67th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC. (Oct.)

Shechter, R. S., 1992. Oil Well Stimulation, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Williams, B. B., Gidley, J. L. and Schechter, R. S., "Acidizing Fundamentals", Monograph Volume 8 SPE, Henry Doherty Series.

How to Cite
SAAVEDRA, N. ., SOLANO, R. ., GIDLEY, D. J. ., REYES, C. A. ., RODRÍGUEZ, P. ., KONDO, F., & HERNÁNDEZ, J. . (1998). Well screening for matrix stimulation treatments. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 1(4), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.575

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
1998-12-31
Section
Scientific and Technological Research Articles

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code