Critical factors for unconventional hydrocarbon resources development

Keywords: Shale gas development, Unconventional oil and gas development, Critical factors, Innovation, International oil companies, Resilience Desarrollo de gas de esquisto, Desarrollo de petróleo y gas en yacimientos no convencionales, Factores críticos, Innovación, Empresas petroleras multinacionales, Resiliencia


Countries all over the world struggle to exploit their Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources (UHR) to secure energy supply, but only a few of them have succeeded. Regulators and decision-makers should understand the critical factors required for companies to attract capital, technology, and good practices to promote innovation and generate the virtuous cycle that translates into sustainable production. This study seeks to identify the most relevant factors for UHR commercial development. We assessed the UHR exploiting state in 60 countries and identified the critical common development factors for the 22 that are most active. The proposed Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development Index (UDI) allows to model, rank, benchmark, and forecast UHR development activity for any given country. We focused on the case of Colombia to illustrate the validity of this Index. Evidence suggests countries where National Oil Companies (NOCs) address the challenge of exploiting UHR on their own, may lack the required expertise, despite having governmental support and capital availability. It is easier for them to emulate resilient North American firms exploiting UHR by partnering with them to effectively incorporate best practices Governments can facilitate the process through UHR support, surface and subsurface risk reduction, a proper tax regime, and ESG practice promotion.


(1) EIA. (2019). World Energy Outlook 2019. [Online]. Available:

(2) Wang, H., Ma, F., Tong, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Wu, Z., Yang, L. (2016). Assessment of global unconventional oil and gas resources. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43(6), 925–940.

(3)Bravo, O., Hernandez, D. (2020). Risk Management Tools Required For Unconventional Oil And Gas Exploration And Development In Latin America, SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility. Bogota.

(4) Saaty, T.L. 2000. Fundamentals of Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.

(5) Adamus, W., & Florkowski, W. J. (2016). The evolution of shale gas development and energy security in Poland: Presenting a hierarchical choice of priorities. Energy Research and Social Science, 20, 168–178.

(6) Bravo, O., Hernandez, D. (2021). Measuring Organizational Resilience: Disruptive Events Facing Unconventional Oil and Gas Enterprise Performance in the Americas. Energy Research and Social Science.

(7)Holdith S. Tight gas sands. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 2006; 58(6): 84-90.

(8)Tong, X., Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Wen, Z., Tian, Z., Wang, H., Wu, Y. (2018). Distribution and potential of global oil and gas resources. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 45(4), 779–789.

(9) Énergie, C. M. D. E. L., Gadonneix, P., Kim, Y. D., Meyers, K., Ward, G., & Frei, C. (2013). World Energy Resources 2013. [Online]. Available:

(10) EIA. (2015). World Shale Resource Assessments, 2011–2014. [Online]. Available:

(11) World Energy Council. (2016). World Energy Resources: Unconventional gas, a global phenomenon. [Online]. Available:

(12) Liu, Z., Wang, H., Blackbourn, G., Feng, M. A., Zhengjun, H. E., Wen, Z., Zhenzhen, W. U. (2019). Heavy Oils and Oil Sands: Global Distribution and Resource Assessment. Acta Geologica Sinica, 93(1), 199–212.

(13) Mccabe, P. J. (2012). Oil and Natural Gas: Global Resources. Fossil Energy.

(14) Cooper, J., Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. (2016). Shale Gas: A Review of the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability. Energy Technology.

(15) Nülle, G. M. (2015). Prospects for shale development outside the USA: Evaluating nations' regulatory and fiscal regimes for unconventional hydrocarbons. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 8(3), 232–268.

(16) Ma, Z., Pi, G., Dong, X., & Chen, C. (2017). The situation analysis of shale gas development in Chinabased on Structural Equation Modeling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 1300–1307.

(17) Weijermars, R., Sorek, N., Sen, D., & Ayers, W. B. (2017). Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering Eagle Ford Shale play economics: US versus Mexico. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 38, 345–372.

(18) Le, M. (2018). An assessment of the potential for the development of the shale gas industry in countries outside of North America. Heliyon, (November 2017), e00516.

(19)Saussay, A. (2017). Can the US shale revolution be duplicated in continental Europe? An economic analysis of European shale gas resources. Energy Economics, 69, 295–306.

(20) Zeid, A. and Lee, J. (2016). Unconventional Shale Gas Development: Application of USA Key Success Factors to other Countries in International Markets, ADIPEC held in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

(21) Zeid, A. and Lee, J. (2017). Unconventional Shale Gas Development: Application of USA Key Success Factors to other Countries in International Markets.

(22)Kryukov, V., & Moe, A. (2018). Does Russian unconventional oil have a future? Energy Policy, 119(November 2017), 41–50.

(23)Yang, Y., Wang, L., Fang, Y., & Mou, C. (2017). Integrated value of shale gas development : A comparative analysis in the United States and China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76(November 2016), 1465–1478.

(24) Rosa, L., Rulli, M. C., Davis, K. F., & D’Odorico, P. (2018). The Water-Energy Nexus of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Global Hydrologic Analysis for Shale Oil and Gas Extraction. Earth's Future, 6(5), 745–756.

(25)Waterworth, A., & Bradshaw, M. J. (2018). Unconventional trade-offs? National oil companies, foreign investment and oil and gas development in Argentina and Brazil. Energy Policy, 122(March), 7–16.

(26) EIA, Independent Statistics & Analysis (2020). [Online]. Available:

(27)Hauser, J. R. (2002). Conjoint Analysis, Related Modeling, and Applications Conjoint Measurement or Conjoint Analysis.

(28) Index, G. I. (2020). THE GLOBAL INNOVATION INDEX (GII) CONCEPTUAL, 55–63. [Online]. Available.

(29) YPF. (2016). Four Years of Vaca Muerta. Vaca Muerta Field Trip. December 2016. [Online]. Available

(30) Wood Mackenzie (2018). Vaca Muerta entry playbook. [Online]. Available:

(31) Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., & de Sherbinin, A., et al. (2018). Metrics for the Environment: Global Environmental Performance Index. Yale University, 123. [Online]. Available:

(32) IHS Markit. 2019. The Vaca Muerta Play: Gaining competitive economics through operational efficiencies. [Online]. Available:

(33) Vargas, C. A. (2012). Evaluating total Yet-to-Find hydrocarbon volume in Colombia. Earth Sci. Res. J., Vol. 16, Special Issue (April 2012): 1-246.

How to Cite
Bravo M, O., & Hernández, D. (2021). Critical factors for unconventional hydrocarbon resources development. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 11(1), 97–108.


Download data is not yet available.
Scientific and Technological Research Articles
Crossref Cited-by logo