Methodology to calculate the fracture gradient in a tectonically active zone: an application in Colombian foothills
Abstract
Fracture gradient estimates are fundamental to predict the pressure required to hydraulically fracture a formation. The main objective of this work is to propose a new methodology to calculate a fracture gradient value based on the application of two new different methods: Pseudo-Overburden Stress Method and Effective Stress Method. These new methods were obtained by modifying and improving two approaches proposed in the literature, putting them in a logic and systematic order, making possible their application to onshore wells, incorporating a new function to calculate calibration constants with the less associated uncertainty, and broadening their scope of application to involve formations at depths different from the initial calibration depths by including a new sub-process. Furthermore, they involve input field parameters: fracture gradient, vertical stress and pore pressure, which describe the geomechanical conditions of the formation. This methodology is validated in the Mirador Superior and Barco formations in Colombian Foothills. Results are compared to values obtained from MinifracTM field data. Application of this methodology allows prediction of reliable fracture gradient values.
References
Addis, M. A., Yassir, N., Willoughby, D. R. & Enever, J. A. (1998). Comparison off leak-off test and extended leak-off test data for stress estimation. SPE/ISRM Eurock 98, Trondheim, Norway. SPE 47235. https://doi.org/10.2118/47235-MS
Altun, G., Langlinais, U. J. & Bourgoyne Jr., A.T. (2001). Application of a new model to analyze leak-off test. 1999Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston. SPE 72061. https://doi.org/10.2118/72061-PA
Anderson, R. A., Ingram, D.S. & Zanier, A. M. (1973). Determining fracture pressure gradients from well logs. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 25, (11).
https://doi.org/10.2118/4135-PA
Brennan, R. M. & Annis, M. R. (1984). A new fracture gradient prediction technique that shows good results in Gulf of Mexico abnormal pressure. 59th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas. SPE 13210. https://doi.org/10.2118/13210-MS
Eaton, B. A. (1969). Fracture gradient prediction and its applications in oilfield operations. Journal of petroleum technology, 21 (10). https://doi.org/10.2118/2163-PA
Fjaer, E., Holt, R. M., Horsrud, P., Raaen, A. & Risnes, R. (1996). Petroleum related rock mechanics. Developments in petroleum science, 33, (1). 269-282.
Hubbert, M. K. & Willis, D. G. (1956). Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Petroleum Branch Fall Meeting, Los Angeles. AIME 210: 153-66. https://doi.org/10.2118/686-G
Mateus, D., Corzo, R., García, R. & Marín, M. (2008). Estudio Geomecánico Prospecto Petrolea Sur. Informe Técnico, Ecopetrol S.A.- Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo (ICP).
Rocha, L. A. & Bourgoyne, A. T. (1996). A new simple method to estimate fracture pressure gradient. Paper first presented at the 1994 SPE Intl. Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico , in Veracruz, Mexico .SPE 28710.
Salz, L. B. (1979). Relationship between fracture propagation pressure and pore pressure. 52nd Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Denver, Colorado. SPE 6870.
Singh, P. K., Agarwal, R. G. & Krase, L. D. (1987). Systematic design and analysis of step-rate tests to determine formation parting pressure. 62nd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers Dallas, TX, SPE 16798-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/16798-MS
Zoback, M. D. (2007). Reservoir geomechanics. (First edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586477
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2009 Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
