Comparison of fuel consumption and recoverable energy according to NEDC and WLTP cycles of a vehicle

Keywords: NEDC | WLTC | WLTP | fuel consumption | CO2 emissions | recoverable energy


Since 1997, the NEDC (New European Driving Cycle) has been used to measure CO2 emissions. However, because this cycle is unable to accurately replicate real-world driving conditions, a new procedure has been developed. The WLTP (Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicles Test Procedure), which is 10 minutes longer and more dynamic than NEDC, has been used since late 2017. In this paper, fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, and energy demand of these two cycles are compared. The vehicle mathematical model was created in a MATLAB program using vehicle longitudinal motion equations for a light commercial vehicle with a diesel engine. The speed profiles of the commonly used NEDC and WLTP cycles were defined in the model, and the fuel consumption, CO2 emission values, and the total energy values required for each cycle were calculated. Furthermore, the recoverable energy potential of the cycle has been revealed. According to the WLTP cycle, the vehicle's fuel consumption and CO2 emission values were calculated at approximately 11% more than the NEDC cycle. The recoverable energy potential is 2.64 times higher in the WLTP cycle compared to the NEDC cycle. Thus, for vehicle designers, it is a very useful tool that can calculate the fuel and CO2 consumption of a vehicle in 100 km according to certain cycles, based on vehicle parameters.


Pavlovic, J., Marotta, A., & Ciuffo, B. (2016). CO2 emissions and energy demands of vehicles tested under the NEDC and the new WLTP type approval test procedures. Applied Energy, 177, 661-670.

Dimaratos, A., Tsokolis, D., Fontaras, G., Tsiakmakis, S., Ciuffo, B., & Samaras, Z. (2016). Comparative evaluation of the effect of various technologies on light-duty vehicle CO2 emissions over NEDC and WLTP. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3169-3178.

Taborda, A. M., Varella, R. A., Farias, T. L., & Duarte, G. O. (2019). Evaluation of technological solutions for compliance of environmental legislation in light-duty passenger: A numerical and experimental approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 70, 135-146.

Tsokolis, D., Tsiakmakis, S., Dimaratos, A., Fontaras, G., Pistikopoulos, P., Ciuffo, B., & Samaras, Z. (2016). Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of passenger cars over the New Worldwide Harmonized Test Protocol. Applied energy, 179, 1152-1165.

Pavlovic, J., Ciuffo, B., Fontaras, G., Valverde, V., & Marotta, A. (2018). How much difference in type-approval CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe can be expected from changing to the new test procedure (NEDC vs. WLTP). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 136-147.

Tzirakis, E., Pitsas, K., Zannikos, F., & Stournas, S. (2006). Vehicle emissions and driving cycles: comparison of the Athens driving cycle (ADC) with ECE-15 and European driving cycle (EDC). Global NEST Journal, 8(3),282-290.

Duarte, G. O., Gonçalves, G. A., & Farias, T. L. (2016). Analysis of fuel consumption and pollutant emissions of regulated and alternative driving cycles based on real-world measurements. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44, 43-54.

Pelkmans, L., & Debal, P. (2006). Comparison of on-road emissions with emissions measured on chassis dynamometer test cycles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11(4), 233-241.

Mellios, G., Hausberger, S., Keller, M., Samaras, C., Ntziachristos, L., Dilara, P., & Fontaras, G. (2011). Parameterisation of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles for modelling purposes. Publications Office of the European Union, EUR, 24927.

Faernlund, J., & Engstrom, C. (2002). The possibilities of producing an engine related test cycle deriving from driving sequences in real world traffic. VAEGVERKET PUBLIKATION, (2002: 111).

Kågeson, P. (1998). Cycle-beating and the EU test cycle for cars. European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), Brussels, vol. 98/3.

DieselNet. (13-Feb-2020). Emission Test Cycles.

UNECE (2008). Status of the work of the motor industry with respect to a global technical regulation on Worldwide harmonized Light-duty Test Procedures (WLTP). [ARCHIVO PDF]

Ehsani, M., Gao, Y., Longo, S., & Ebrahimi, K. M. (2018).Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles. CRC press., (3rd ed)

Mashadi, B., & Crolla, D. A. (2012). Vehicle powertrain systems (p. 129). London: Wiley.

Tutuianu, M., Marotta, A., Steven, H., Ericsson, E., Haniu, T., Ichikawa, N., & Ishii, H. (2013). Development of a World-wide Worldwide harmonized Light duty driving Test Cycle (WLTC). Technical Report, vol. 03, no. January, pp. 7–10.

Marotta, A., Pavlovic, J., Ciuffo, B., Serra, S., & Fontaras, G. (2015). Gaseous emissions from light-duty vehicles: moving from NEDC to the new WLTP test procedure. Environmental science & technology, 49 (14), 8315-8322.

European Automobile Manufacturers Association. (2018). What is WLTP and How Does It Work?. URl: https://wltpfacts. eu/what-is-wltp-how-will-it-work/.(Accessed:02.01. 2020).

Ligterink, N. E., van Mensch, P., & Cuelenaere, R.F. (2016). NEDC-WLTP comparative testing. Delft: TNO.

Mock, P., Kühlwein, J., Tietge, U., Franco, V., Bandivadekar, A., & German, J. (2014). The WLTP: How a new test procedure for cars will affect fuel consumption values in the EU. International council on clean transportation, 9(3547).

How to Cite
Karamangil, M. İhsan, & Tekin, M. (2022). Comparison of fuel consumption and recoverable energy according to NEDC and WLTP cycles of a vehicle. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 12(2), 31–38.


Download data is not yet available.
Scientific and Technological Research Articles


QR Code
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views